Payment Gateway for Micropayments: Everything You Need to Know as an E-Commerce Merchant

All of the prices included in the article are based on the information provided on the companies’ individual websites as of 8 September 2025 and are subject to change.
If you run an online shop or platform, you have probably wondered what micropayments are and whether they can work for your business. Micropayments are tiny transactions, like a few pence for an in-app item, a tip for a content creator, or pay-per-article access on a news site. This type of payment is becoming more common as digital content, gaming, micro subscriptions and even IoT services move towards pay-as-you-go models.
The challenge of micropayments is that standard card fees make micropayments unworkable. When providers add a fixed charge on top of a percentage fee, the maths simply does not add up for very small amounts. This leads many independent merchants to avoid them on the whole. However, finding a suitable micropayment gateway or processor can help your business capitalise on the current market shift.
In this guide, we will define micropayments, look at real micropayments examples, explain how PayPal micropayments and Stripe microtransactions are priced, and outline which micropayment companies and systems are worth considering. We will also demonstrate how open banking solutions, such as Noda’s flat-fee model, can enable e-commerce merchants to make micropayments sustainable.
While there is no single universal threshold, in practice, most micropayments usually sit under a pound and often under fifty pence (or, respectively, a euro and 50 cents), with some definitions of micropayments stretching to a few pounds for digital content. The classic technical approaches are prepaid wallets where users top up an account and spend in tiny increments, or specialised micropayment processors that offer lower per-transaction costs. The recent trend indicates that making micropayments easier for developers and merchants is a priority, but the economics remain the hard part.
Micropayments are used wherever many small interactions need monetising. News sites often use pay-by-article strategies, whilst social platforms experiment with tipping. Gaming sites selling low-value items are also a significant part of the micropayments ecosystem (according to Gaming Insider, 58% of PC gaming revenue in 2024 came from microtransactions). Other micropayments examples include metered APIs charging per call and IoT services billing tiny data or usage units. Micropayments also work for charitable giving and micro subscriptions that let users pay a small amount for a narrow slice of service. For any product where conversion is improved by letting someone pay a few pence instead of committing to a subscription, micropayments are worth exploring.
When it comes to handling micropayment transactions, the core problem is simple. Card fees are a combination of a percentage plus a fixed fee. Using a typical UK merchant rate, a transaction of 10p with a card provider charging 1.5 % + 20p would cost the merchant around 20p. That means the merchant loses money on the sale before any other costs are calculated in. Even when providers offer a micropayments tier, such as PayPal’s micropayments option, which ranges between 5-6% plus a fixed 5p micropayment fee, the economics only work at certain price points or volumes.
Because of this, many PSPs are cautious about onboarding micropayment models without bespoke pricing. The administrative overhead of huge volumes of tiny transactions creates reconciliation challenges, raises fraud monitoring costs and increases the relative impact of chargebacks. Currency rounding and FX costs can also erode tiny margins. All of this leads many merchants to bundle small purchases into larger charges or to use prepaid wallet models, but that can hurt conversion or add friction for users.
Handling millions of tiny transactions changes the operational shape of a business. Reconciliation becomes heavier, reporting must be able to aggregate enormous numbers of micro receipts, and fraud and dispute flows need rethinking because traditional chargeback processes are too costly relative to the value of each item. For cross-border micropayments, merchants will also face multiple currency rounding issues and differing bank rules. Settlement speed matters more because funds tied up in slow clearing can have an outsized impact on cash flow when unit values are tiny and volumes are high.
A handful of providers offer micro-specific options, and many mainstream platforms provide workarounds:
Noda is designed to handle high-volume, low-value transactions by operating on open banking rails rather than traditional card networks. This way it replaces the costly percentage-plus-fixed-fee structure with custom flat-fee pricing per payment, making even the smallest transactions financially sustainable.
Merchants also benefit from instant or near-instant settlement directly into their accounts, removing the cash flow delays common with card providers. Because transactions move across the bank rails, there are no chargebacks tied to card schemes, reducing both financial risk and administrative burden. Reconciliation within the micropayment system is made more straightforward, helping finance teams process large volumes of microtransactions with ease.
From a technical perspective, Noda offers a comprehensive API and ready-made plugins to streamline integration into websites, apps, and platforms. By using open banking authorisation and settlement, Noda not only lowers fees but also reduces operational friction, ensuring a smoother experience for both merchants and customers.
PayPal has historically offered a micropayments tier aimed at digital content, tips and other low-value transactions. This PayPal micropayments option can work for certain merchants, especially those selling casual purchases or small pieces of content. However, the solution still comes with notable overheads and longer payout times, which can cause problems for businesses that depend on fast, high-volume sales.
The issue of PayPal micropayment fees is also significant. While the model can look appealing at first, the fee structure often makes very small transactions expensive, cutting into margins and making it hard to scale profitably. For this reason, some merchants explore alternatives such as micropayment apps or open banking solutions.
Stripe does not provide a dedicated micropayments tariff, which means merchants are left paying the standard percentage plus fixed card fees. For very small transactions, this quickly erodes margins and makes Stripe an expensive choice without custom arrangements.
While the platform supports flexible models such as Billing and Connect, dedicated micropayment pricing is only available in certain markets. In regions where it is not offered, Stripe instead advises batching multiple small payments into a single larger charge to help reduce fees. This approach can work for some use cases but introduces added complexity and does not fully address the cost challenge of microtransactions on Stripe.
Merchants might also want to consider specialist micropayment companies and regional options. Some donation and tipping platforms, local bank apps like Sweden’s Swish, and newer startups focused on microtips or content payments can offer low cost per transaction, but often with geographic limits or limited integration options. In some regions, processing micropayments through mobile carriers is also an option.
When evaluating micropayment processors, consider factors beyond headline fees. Look for flat fee options that make sense at your ticket size, fast settlement that keeps cash available, developer tools and SDKs that minimise friction, and fraud tooling tuned to tiny transactions.
Multi-currency support, predictable reconciliation, and reporting are crucial. Finally, check how returns and disputes are handled, because chargebacks at scale can be ruinous unless the model avoids them.
One way to cut costs is to bundle several small actions into one charge, instead of billing each transaction separately. Another option is to use variable recurring billing, where customers are charged once they reach a certain usage threshold rather than for every tiny event. Wherever possible, it also helps to use bank payments instead of card networks. With open banking and Noda as your payment gateway, payments can be made instantly from the customer’s bank, avoiding card fees and making it easier to apply a simple flat micro fee that keeps micropayments profitable.
Noda’s platform delivers all of this in a single integration:
Book Your Free Demo – Discover how Noda can help your e-commerce business accelerate by using micropayments.
Usually under £1 and often down to pence.
Technically yes, but fees usually eat any margin unless you use a specialist tariff or bundle payments.
With open banking solutions, like Noda, funds often arrive instantly or within a few hours.
Square can technically handle small transactions, but Square micropayments pricing does not exist. Because its standard card fees apply, very low-value purchases end up costing merchants disproportionately more. Businesses dealing with lots of tiny payments often need alternatives, such as bundling purchases or using prepaid balances, since Square is generally not optimised for true micropayments.